HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE
Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex.
HCO POLICY LEITER OF 15 FEBRUARY 1966
ATTACKS ON SCIENTOLOGY
Exec Sec Hats
HCO Sec Hat
Legal Officer Hat
LRH Comm Hat
Dist Sec Hat
Sect 5 Dept 3
Anyone proposing an investigation of or an “Enquiry” into Scientology must receive this reply and no other proposal:
“We welcome an investigation into (Mental Healing or whoever is attacking us) as we have begun one ourselves and find shocking evidence.”
You can elaborate on the evidence we have found and lay it on thick attacking the attackers only. NEVER agree to an investigation of Scientology. ONLY agree to an investigation of the attackers
This was the BIG error made in Victoria. I Okayed an Enquiry into all Mental healing. I ordered evidence on psychiatric murders to be collected.
Non-compliance with these orders brought on the loss of Melbourne and the law in Victoria against Scientology. This was the non-compliance that began it.
The original order I gave was relayed as “we welcome an Enquiry into Scientology . . .” or it was changed to that in Melbourne.
This is correct procedure:
(1) Spot who is attacking us.
(2) Start investigating them promptly for FELONIES or worse using own professionals, not outside agencies.
(3) Double curve our reply by saying we welcome an investigation of them.
(4) Start feeding lurid, blood sex crime actual evidence on the attackers to the press.
Don’t ever tamely submit to an investigation of us. Make it rough, rough on attackers all the way.
You can get “reasonable about it” and lose. Sure we break no laws. Sure we have nothing to hide. BUT attackers are simply an anti-Scientology propaganda agency so far as we are concerned. They have proven they want no facts and will only lie no matter what they discover. So BANISH all ideas that any fair hearing is intended and start our attack with their first breath. Never wait. Never talk about us – only them. Use their blood, sex, crime to get headlines. Don’t use us.
I speak from 15 years of experience in this There has never yet been an attacker who was not reeking with crime. All we had to do was look for it and murder would come out.
They fear our Meter. They fear freedom. They fear the way we are growing. Why?
Because they have too much to hide.
When you use that rationale you win. When you go dishwater and say “we honest chickens just plain love to have you in the coop, Brer Fox,” we get clobbered. The right response is “We militant public defenders of the freedom of the people want that there Fox investigated for eating living chickens!” Shift the spotlight to them. No matter how. Do it!
You can elaborate on the formula. Let’s say some other branch of government wants to investigate us via the press Just apply the formula:
“We welcome a public enquiry into (that branch activity) as we already have begun to investigate their (…).”
It will always work. It even would have worked on the U.S. F.D.A. when they first began five years before their raid on DC. They run! And that’s all we want.
HOW TO STOP ATTACKS
The way we will eventually stop all attacks from there on out is by processing the society as follows:
(1) Locate a source of attack on us.
(2) Investigate it.
(3) Expose it with wide lurid publicity.
You see the same thing in a preclear. He has a rotten spot in his behaviour. He attacks the practitioner. The spot is located on a meter. It blows and the preclear relaxes. Well this is just what is happening in the society. We are a practitioner to the society. It has rotten spots in it. Those show up in attacks an us. We investigate and expose – the attack ceases.
We use investigators instead of E-Meters. We use newspapers instead of auditor reports. But it’s the same problem exactly.
So long as we neglect our role as auditor-to-the-society we will be attacked.
Society is pretty crazy. It’s a raw jungle. So it will take a lot of work. We must be willing to put in that work as a group or we’ll be knocked about.
Remember, CHURCHES ARE LOOKED UPON AS REFORM GROUPS.
Therefore we must act like a reform group.
The way to seize the initiative is to use our own professionals to investigate intensively parts of the society that may attack us. Get an ammunition locker full. Be sure of our facts. And then expose via the press.
If we do this right, press, instead of trying to invent reasons to attack us will start hanging around waiting for our next lurid scoop.
We must convert from an attacked group to a reform group that attacks rotten spots in the society. We should not limit ourselves to mental healing or own line. We should look for groups to investigate and blow the lid off and become known as a mightly reform group. We object to slavery, oppression, torture, murder, perversion, crime, political sin and anything that makes Man unfree.
The only error we can make is disperse our investigation. We do a preliminary look, then we must select a target and investigate it until we have the cold facts and then BANG, fire the salvo.
Don’t worry about libel if our facts indicate rottenness. The last thing that target will do is sue as then we would have a chance to prove it in court, which they are terrified of our doing.
Remember – the only reason we are in trouble with the press or government is that we are not searching out and exposing rotten spots in the society. We must practice on the whole group called society. If we do not it will attack us just as preclear will attack a Scientologist that won’t audit
To get wholly over to cause we must select targets, investigate and expose before they attack us. We have at this writing a long way to go. But we might as well start somewhere. Begin by investigating any attacking group, find and expose the dead bodies. Then work on to our selecting the targets.
And that will handle it all.
L. RON HUBBARD
So glad LRH put his deepest beliefs in print. And that will handle it all, alright.
“Solve it with Scientology.”
PR MODE ON
That policy was cancelled in the late 60s
PR MODE OFF
Make the enemies of Scientology pay!!!!!!!!
Har har. Yep it was cancelled alright. That’s why it was the first policy in my hat pack in 1977
Yeah. We have fair game, but we don’t. We have disconnection, but we don’t. We’re a religion, but we make medical claims. We have $2billion, but we desperately need your money. The complaints filed against us were all either too long or too short…
Someone should forward this theta HCO PL to HBO HQ. Do you part in promoting planetary clearing!
Well, thank you Mr. OTVIII. I can clearly see the Founder’s impeccable logic.
Naturally religious doubters, apostates and heretics must be quickly dealt with for the larger good of society.
So to that end, the Founder provided many wonderful tools for we at The Church of Scientology, to carry out our humanitarian and religious mission:
I agree. There is something wrong with a group that is obsessed with an organization which everyone already knows is a scam. Why would they waste their time like that? Are they insane? Maybe they need a psych. That group should be looked at.
One go the first things I had to do when I started my “secondary training” was star rate this policy. It was taken very seriously and was drilled into us. It took a lot of years to shake this training that was drilled into me by this insane policy.
This is not a joke. I wish it was.
“They fear our Meter”? But in 1973, Hubbard issued this statement: “By itself, this meter does nothing. It is solely for the guide of Ministers of the sect in Confessionals and pastoral counseling. The Electrometer is not medically or scientifically capable of improving the health or bodily function of anyone and is for religious use by students and Ministers of the Church of Scientology only.” Why should we fear the “meter” if it “does nothing” by itself? Perhaps we should just wait for the “press” to hang on Miscavige’s every word, hoping he will throw them some lurid scoops.
I think its the brainwashing that they fear.
“They fear our meter”is a very true statement.
If you take the 2 cans off the meter and tie them together with a foot of wire you have a very effective set of nunchucks.Nothing more scary than a pissed off Ethics officer coming at you with a set of those bad boys.
“We object to slavery, oppression, torture, murder, perversion, crime, political sin and anything that makes Man unfree.”
LRH definition of object has got to be a doosie.